Studio International

home

search

Comments

 

Review: 49th Biennale of Venice, through 4 November
The Plateau of Humankind

This first Biennale of the 21st century came as stuck in the fin-de-siecle as the last one. Harald Szeeman, the Director, seemed surprised by the new media onslaught circa l995; even the title seemed to imply that the ‘plateau’ was more of a swamp – a quagmire of plunging 'tendenzia'. The bevies of glinting turtles seemed on further encounter mildly predatory – gratis the Cracking Art Group – preying upon the sensibilities, so to say, for, given the phenomenal congestion so far evidenced, the major intention of the critics becalmed in a queue in the Giardini di Castello was then to preserve a modicum of actual human perception.

If 'Humankind' were to be united in line with the official thematics of this Biennale, it was only seemingly in the less traditionally favoured national pavilions, a kind of unity of provincial ambition. Eastern and western hemispherics alike were thus conjoined by a speculative waywardness; a despondency whereby artists selected by the respective national commissioners ritualistically examined the entrails of multimedia arts of the previous decade.

Older figures, such as Cy Twombly, long resident in Italy himself, would still display their accomplished works in paint, perhaps that being the new-found medium in the sea of multi-screen videos punctutated by such troglodytic progressions through a constructed mausolea of despondency. In ‘Mwana Kitoko’ (Beautiful White Man) with lightly diffused paint, Luc Tuymans reveals his versatility in the medium. Mark Wallinger's 'Threshold to the Kingdom', first shown in Liverpool, videos passengers arriving through airport customs via sliding doors. But, as if then to parody the idea of nationalism, Wallinger prefaces this drama at the entry with 'Oxymoron l997’ which offers a Union Jack in Irish Republican colours. Then Wallinger shows 'Time and Relative Dimensions in Space' his 'Tardis' in burnished steelwork. Thus Wallinger is, in varying episodes at Venice, personalising the individual's response to the imposed, collectivised, and problematic nationalisms of today.

The Japanese Pavilion coyly reproduces the McDonalds logo enlarged to the scale of billboards: this would never materialise at the Russian Pavilion. Of course, here Leonid Sokov, like the man who fell to earth, reflects upon the paradoxes of the totemic object in the 20th century art repository from Duchamp to Beuys. However, this merely serves to reinforce the all-pervasive ennuie beside the lagoon.

Well, perhaps Szeeman really had intended 'The Plateau' to provide some defaced preamble to the Arsenale, where established players, such as Richard Serra and Bill Viola, are allocated all the space to which they might be accustomed, so required to confound the very pessimism of the various national agendas at the Giardini. Also, the great parties of D'Offay, Yves Saint Laurent, Sotheby and Guggenheim do reflect in less than subtle ways the natural shift of gravity at the Biennale from the Giardini – Biennale as 'tradition' (for example the Tate Britain) to Arsenale (for example the Tate Modern).

Yet uniquely amongst Biennalia, it is the physical sense of place in Venice that prompts such deviations on the 'national' fringe, while the Arsenale proffers a life-giving transfusion of energy without which the Plateau of Humankind, perceptually at least, would be seen as a doomed flood plain. Yet we can relate to Estonia's 'Licked Room', ponderously revealing a tall female licking every square centimetre of the pavilion, even if its dating would seem to be circa l986. Germany had allowed Gregor Schneider to construct a restrictive domestic enclosure that deliberately restricted the experience to one-person-at-a -time capacity, both impractical and banal. Trekking on through the 'Plateau of Humankind' now seems a race against time: forced away from the national pavilions a full itinerary was timed to take some three days, copious supplies of acqua minerale, bedding, spare trainers, and whatever else. But, Bill Viola's 'Surrender' is at hand, defining love of humankind – a commodity not readily discernible elsewhere on the circuit – defining human love with sublime beauty by means of counterposing reflections in water. Yet time here is prerogative, immeasurable, but claimed all the same. Mostly, one has only two days to give – a week might prove more generally appropriate (if the catalogue is also to be taken in).

Here might be a last, British chauvinism: that is to say that Mike Nelson's Venice exposure can well promote his chances of winning the next Turner Prize. Nelson's own sequential labyrinthine tunnel neatly upstages the work in a similar vein by the aforesaid Gerhard Schneider. It even upstages Mark Wallinger as the official British entry. Such are the joys of the Arsenale. When is the next flight but one back home?

READERS COMMENTS

 

 
Be the first to comment on this article
 

ADD YOUR COMMENT:

Name:

Email: (Your email address will not be published)

Town and country:

Your comment:

Please note that this is a moderated feedback page and all comments are reviewed prior to appearing on this page.

Please enter the code shown above into the box below. This helps us prevent spam messages being logged onto this site:

home | architecture | archive | books | museology | new media | painting | photography | reports | sculpture |

Copyright © 1893–2008 The Studio Trust. The title Studio International is the property of The Studio Trust and, together with the content, are bound by copyright. All rights reserved