Studio International

home

search

Comments

 

Swinging from chandeliers: architecture of delight

Ecstasy and fatigue, according to the neuro-psychologist Richard Gregory, go together. ‘Ecstatic states of mastery over, or of oneness with, all things, are to be treasured, but they can lead to over-confidence, if say while climbing a mountain, or piloting an aircraft’. Certainly, there is little of intellect required to reach the state Gregory describes, which makes it the more accessible and appealing to most seekers today.

Following the Napoleonic wars, and before l815 even, ecstasy returned to good cheer. In Regency England, it was the chandelier that ‘dazzled and puzzled’. Circa 1812, at Carlton House, the residence of the Prince Regent, such chandeliers formed the grand climax visually to the circular drawing room, as Sacheverell Sitwell enthused:

‘… the cut glass chandelier, of immense length, representing the jet d’eau of a fountain and playing from the centre of the room up into the painted sky, reflected in the four pier glasses opposite, which repeat each other, and the lesser chandeliers in endless repetition. The chandelier, we may remark, was an article of furniture dear to the Prince Regent, and characteristic of him’.

(British Architects and Craftsmen, 1945, p176)

Or, at the Brighton Pavilion, as recorded in meticulous drawings by the elder Pugin, who found the chandeliers ‘beyond comprehension’. Webster’s Dictionary, (1815) then described Ecstasy as, ‘Any passion by which the thoughts are absorbed, and in which the mind is for a time lost; excessive joy, rapture, enthusiasm, excessive elevation of the mind; madness, distraction’.

This was of course, the age of Nash, and the end of Soane, and with peace came dislocation, national exhaustion, as well as regeneration, a new elegance and stylism. A year ‘without summer’ followed during which crops were ruined, Frankenstein was invented, and a frantic search for new stimuli was on.

Similarly in the momentous decade since 1990, with the ending of the Cold War, the Gulf War, and lesser Civil Wars, the way has become clear to focus on currency wars, drug wars, style wars, and terrorist wars. Truly, ecstatic spaces are on offer to relieve us from the pall of terrorist war.

Nicholas Grimshaw’s recent proposals for the world famous spa at Bath have something of the quality of a vast Regency Chandelier; here glass, light, steam and water are brilliantly correlated in a last ditch attempt to revitalise the ancient baths. Future spa fans will be enthralled by a dramatic wall of steam drawing them towards the new treatment zones, Jacuzzis and swimming pools.

Alsop and Stormers’ recently completed Erotic Museum, in Hamburg’s notorious Reeperbahn is another example of the workings of ecstasy, with the architect as sorcerer. Here again a somewhat seedy environment in decline is regenerated by an infusion of wit and colour, with all the skill a building can display to contrive that ultimate moment of ecstatic relief. The Stirling Prize-winning Peckham Library (2000) likewise infuses purpose with an architecture of pleasure. And now he proposes to add glitter and glitz to our hospitals.

David Hockney’s 1960s masterpiece, A Bigger Splash, is curiously echoed in Hudson Feathersone’s Swimming Pool constructed in North Devon (1997). The light ripples across the pool, behind a tamarisk hedge, protected by a flesh-pink coloured end wall that supports a chandelier-suggestive fountain amidst light Corbusian detailing that contains an ironic whiff of parody.

In contrast, Damien Hirst’s 1991 installation In and Out of Love, demonstrated where ecstasy or horror ends, and the sublime begins. The happily wafted butterflies in the upper room were in stark contrast in the upstairs, in-love space, to the downstairs ‘out-of-love’ space that emphasised haphazard, accidentally or deliberately dead insects. So ecstasy, by contrast, is an experiential climacteric in space, expanding to grasp this ill-founded millennium, sensual, physical, and sexually anticipated through the senses. Ducking the demands of the soul, claiming the relief of these appetites, disconnecting the cerebral all the way… until the next cataclysm to follow, wherever, after 11 September … or have we again touched the ground this time?

So, ecstasy combines the relief of survival from the last explosive device with the thrilling anticipation of new delights, Ecstasy is worldly-wise, without innocence, and fuelled by high-octane charisma and the star-struck response… until the next kamikaze. The question is, where can innocence survive? Is it not now confined only to the mental sanatorium?

READERS COMMENTS

 

 
Be the first to comment on this article
 

ADD YOUR COMMENT:

Name:

Email: (Your email address will not be published)

Town and country:

Your comment:

Please note that this is a moderated feedback page and all comments are reviewed prior to appearing on this page.

Please enter the code shown above into the box below. This helps us prevent spam messages being logged onto this site:

home | architecture | archive | books | museology | new media | painting | photography | reports | sculpture |

Copyright © 1893–2008 The Studio Trust. The title Studio International is the property of The Studio Trust and, together with the content, are bound by copyright. All rights reserved