|
Uploaded 09/8/02
Masters of Colour: Derain
to Kandinsky
Masterpieces from the
Merzbacher Collection.
Sackler Galleries, Royal
Academy of the Arts, London,
27 July17 November 2002.
Only 30 years ago, Gabrielle and Werner Merzbacher began to form
a collection of early 20th century art that has become one of the
finest yet least known private collections of modern art in the
world. The collection was formed around a small number of fine paintings
inherited by Gabrielle Merzbacher from her paternal grandfather,
Bernard Mayer. These included Paul Cézanne, Pierre-Auguste
Renoir, Alexej von Jawlensky, Henri Matisse and Vincent Van Gogh.
Given that by the 1970s when Merzbacher began to seriously collect,
most of the key works from this period were already in major museums,
he has managed to locate and acquire a collection that is greater
than one might expect.
The exhibition on show at the Royal Academy is, in fact, a remarkable
collection of vivid and powerful works chosen primarily out of personal
response to a work than the employment of scholarly or intellectual
criteria. And yet it includes works from an amazing range of modern
movements. The exhibition opens with the Impressionists and Post-impressionists
(normally on permanent loan to international museums), seminal works
by Picasso and Matisse, Fauve paintings, Expressionists, Cubists,
Futurists and the Russian avant-garde. Among the highlights of the
Royal Academy show are: Cézanne, Still-Life, Skull
and Candlestick, 1866-7, Derain, Boats in the Port of
Collioure. 1905, Van Gogh, Garden with Weeping Willow,
1888, Renoir, Portrait of a Young Woman, 1901, Picasso, The
Couple (The Miserable), 1904, Matisse, Interior at Collioure,
1905, Braque, LEstaque, 1906. There are several works
each by Vasily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, Ernst Ludwig Kirckner, Emil
Nolde, Jawlensky, Erich Heckel, and Karl Schmidt-Rotluff. Certain
works in the context of this exhibition create an unexpectedly forceful
presence, for example, the marvellous portrait by Jawlensky, Lady
in a Yellow Hat, c.1910, a determined vital work, and
Max Beckmanns Woman with a Red Rooster, 1941,
a painting with implied drama and tension and strong formal preoccupations.
The exhibition is characterised by the vivid colours used by artists
with a wide range of preoccupations and intent; the collection itself
is the product of a personal quest and passion. The result is an
exhibition where different aspects of the modern movement interact
in dramatic and uplifting ways. Until this exhibition the
first European showing of the Merzbacher Collection only
curators and art professionals have been aware of the remarkable
holdings of this unique and relatively new collection. The core
of the collection dates back to Gabrielle Merzbachers grandfather
who provided a supportive milieu for the collection of art and the
exchange of ideas. A prosperous merchant, whose business included
branches in Berlin, Paris, Amsterdam and Zurich, he was also interested
in literature, political and social issues. His summerhouse in Ascona,
Switzerland attracted a wide circle of artists and visitors including
Alexej von Jawlensky, Arthur Segal, Marianne von Werefkin and Christian
Rohlfs. Soon after settling in Switzerland, Mayer began to buy modern
paintings. He took the core of this collection to America during
the war and then returned with them to Switzerland after the war.
Among the collection were works by Van Gogh, Cézanne, James
Ensor, Kandinsky, Jawlensky, Matisse, Renoir and Arthur Segal. After
his death in 1946 Mayers collection of some 12 key works (some
had been lost in the moving around) was divided between his son
Ernst and his daughter Lily. Gabrielle Merzbacher (née Mayer)
had enjoyed a close relationship with her grandfather and shared
his interest in art, literature, and the Jewish cause.
Werner Merzbacher was born in 1928 in Southern Germany where his
father was a highly respected doctor. The full scale of the Nazi
threat was realised too late by them; as a result his parents sent
him and his brother to Switzerland but they themselves never followed,
and later perished in Auschwitz. Werners brother Rudolph became
mentally ill and died at a young age in a Swiss institution. Werner
himself stayed in Switzerland for some ten years where he was educated
with scholarships. Penniless and orphaned he went to America in
1949; where two years later he married Gabrielle Mayer. In 1953
he entered the New York fur market as partner in the firm Mayer
and Hofman and Max Pick, Inc. In 1964 the Merzbachers returned to
Switzerland with their three children. He continued in the fur trade
there; in 1989 he became owner of Mayer and Cie AG. He became increasingly
active in the field of international finance. A tireless and enthusiastic
individual, Merzbachers personality is reflected in his choice
of works to purchase. I really believe that an honest collection,
made over a lifetime, should reflect the personality of the collector
After all, one neednt have everything. The best collections
come from within you.1
Although the Merzbacher collection and the man himself are flamboyant,
until now he has always bought anonymously and made loans to exhibitions
as Private Collection. The Royal Academy exhibition
is the first opportunity for the public to see their fabulous collection
and for the Merzbachers to assume a major public role. Colour is
the unifying element of the works on show; so too are the formal
dynamics of the pictures. What interests me are the many similarities,
as well as important differences, in the handling of colour across
Europe. I like to see the expression of different countries in their
handling of colour the playfulness of the French soul, the
harshness of the German but also the relationship between
them
A thread runs through (the collection). The paintings
have to live together, I hope visitors will appreciate this thread
and see how each work talks to each other.2
Merzbacher first encountered Fauve, German Expressionist and Russian
avant-garde works in exhibitions in New York in the 1960s and 1970s.
A Fauve exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art, New York left a
particularly strong impression. At the Leonard Hutton Galleries
in New York during the same period he encountered the passionate,
dramatic and romantic spirits of Kandinsky, Kirchner and Franz Marc.
Financially their work was out of his league at this stage, but
he had effectively fallen in love with it and vowed to acquire such
pieces one day. Ingrid Hutton recalls that Merzbacher often visited
their gallery in the seventies, and displayed interest in the work
of the German Expressionists.
It was the energy and the colour in a painting that attracted
him. In the beginning my husband guided him. Sometimes he
would see a work and tell us he couldnt sleep, he
just kept thinking about it. Even today he still tries to
buy some of the works he saw in the beginning. They have
haunted him until now
he is very attached to his
art. He absolutely loves it. His reaction to a painting
is not intellectual it is from the heart
His
is an immediate love affair with the painting.3
There are numerous links to be made between various aspects of
the modern movement in Europe in the early 20th century. It is no
coincidence that one can feel equal enthusiasm for artists as different
in most respects as Sonia Delaunay-Terk and Natalie Goncharova,
between Jawlensky and Klee, between Kandinsky and Derain. These
artists all inspire great passion partly because they existed geographically
apart yet they were preoccupied with variations on a theme. The
Delaunays influenced Paul Klee and Franz Marc greatly in Germany
and the Italian Futurists, Umberto Boccioni and Gino Severini. The
Futurists in turn influenced the Russian avant-garde. The Russians
who painted sets for Diagalev influenced the French artists when
the Ballet Russes visited Paris in 1905. Further, Robert Delaunay
exhibited with Blaue Reiter artists and corresponded with Kandinsky.
Kandinskys Concerning the Spiritual in Art, addressed
the meaning and effect of colour; it was widely read by artists
and theorists in the early part of the twentieth century. Kandinsky
also exhibited in Paris in 1911 and 1912 at the Salon des Indépendents.
Another strikingly direct connection, this time between
artistic generations, involves one of the Merzbachers
Kandinskys. In August 1914, Kandinsky, a Russian citizen,
was forced to flee Germany, leaving everything behind. His
Angel of the Last Judgement (1911) was one of the
works entrusted to Hans Hofman for safekeeping. Hofman opened
a school in Munich and taught there until 1932, when he
emigrated to the United States, apparently taking the Angel
with him.4
Hofman became one of the most influential artists and teachers
in America in the development of Abstract Expressionism. Basic
to his theory of painting was the concept of the push and
pull of colour, for which he was indebted to ideas developed
by Kandinsky.5 As well as concentrating on several favourites
such as Kandinsky who is represented by seven paintings, the Merzbacher
collection also includes key works by numerous great names of the
modern movement. The most outstanding works in my experience of
the show are Derains, Boats in the Port of Collioure,
Matisses, Interior at Collioure, Picassos The
Couple, a superb example of his blue period, and the Kandinskys.
The Guardians reviewer Adrian Searle appears to be
the only critic so far who has not enjoyed the unexpected nature
of the show, describing it as chaotic, excessive and at war
with itself. Although he concedes that there are some flashes
of inspiration, he writes:
One must remember that this is a private collection, not
a coherent display, and that the emphasis on colour in the
awful title is just a peg. The sculptures of Julio Gonzalez,
Henri Laurens and Jacques Lipchitz have nothing to do with
colour, unless it is brown. As for the painters, colour
is put to the service of so many divergent aims optical
effect, musicality, emotional tenor, topographic description,
spiritual aspiration, symbolism, atmosphere and so on
that it becomes almost impossible to think about
There
is too much paint, too much painting, too much colour and
too much description in Vlamincks work, too much ostentatious
brushwork. Early Derains, like Matisses early paintings,
breathe, while Vlamincks feel clogged-up and stifling.
Many of the painters here seem to have a lot in common now
than they did in their own times. There are a lot of bright,
brushy paintings in the Merzbacher collection, all intent
on asserting themselves. Hung close, all those post-impressionists,
fauves, Die Brücke, Blaue Reiter and expressionist
paintings tend to cancel each other out. The viewer must
work to get beyond all that frank and sometimes blundering
brushwork, all the red everywhere. The collection makes
for a claustrophobic experience.6
Searle goes on to state that he would hate to live with the Merzbacher
collection. The Guardian review reads alarmingly like the
extreme and vitriolic reviews of the first Post-Impressionist exhibition
in 1910 at the Grafton Galleries. Organised by Roger Fry, it caused
a public outrage and the press went crazy. In 1910 Roger Frys
reputation was destroyed and the works on show described as the
works of madmen. Fry himself was declared to be a subverter
of morals and art and a blatant self-advertiser.7 Searles
obsessive criticism here is focussed on the collector, I would
hate to live with this stuff all the time, as Werner and Gabrielle
Merzbacher apparently do. I would end up having Die Brücke
domestics, Blaue Reiter rows and expressionist tantrums. He
describes the Renoir as hideous, the Modigliani as awful and the
Kokoschka as dreary. But he is by his own admission prone to irrational
outbursts. Fortunately for Searle, he found a calming Malevich before
suffering total aperplexy.
Colour Theory and Colour Practice in Early Twentieth Century
Art by John Gage8 describes the fascination by numerous artists
and theorists during the period covered by the exhibition. Any student
of this period will have read Kandinskys Concerning the
Spiritual in Art, and theories pertaining to the role of colour
in the painting of the post-impressionists. The role of individuals
and of subjective experience in the art of the early 20th century
was of paramount importance. Prior to and between the two World
Wars, artists responded in passionate and dramatic terms. The exciting
characteristic of so many works in the Merzbacher collection is
the continued struggle and determination to make life better. There
is indeed a kind of chaos inherent in the Merzbacher collection
but it is the chaos that comes from acknowledging the complexity
and disappointments in individual experience, in modern life, in
politics and in the prospect of an uncertain future. It remains
so, that by acknowledging the enemy be it psychological or
political it is possible to focus on the sublime, on moments
of perfection. Matisses art has perhaps been devalued because
he himself described it as being like a good armchair. The comforting
or pleasing quality of many of his compositions do not denote a
soft option for there was prior to the creative act itself an inner
struggle. His calm was not necessarily easily won.
The idea of the power of pigment is something I feel an affinity
for. The Royal Academy exhibition has an uplifting effect. It is
psychologically energising and feels truly good for the soul. That
such a collection was created by an individual whose life began
with such tragedy and loss is inspiring. His life and the collection
that he and his wife have created are inextricably linked. In Stephanie
Rachums catalogue essay, The Joy of Colour: the Merzbachers
and their Collection, she concludes that passion is the single
distinguishing feature of the Merzbacher Collection.9 John Gage
evaluates the period covered by the exhibition:
Colour among most of the artists represented in the Merzbacher
collection reflects the emergence of painters from the positivist
climate of the nineteenth-century into a culture so laden
with conflicting theories that the only course open to them
was subjectivism. But it was a subjectivism entirely in
tune with the psychological temper of the first quarter
of the twentieth century.10
The present exhibition strikes a chord with the psychological temper
of the present time uncertainty, personal loss, drama, but
also a tenacious hope.
Janet McKenzie
|